Never Again vs. Never Healed: How America's Unchecked Past Fuels Its Present Crisis
From Germany’s Denazification to America’s Lost Cause: A Deep Dive into the Difference in Accountability and Denial between the Two Countries
At the 61st Munich Security Conference this past week, an emotional Christoph Heusgen, the conference chairman, closed the event with a stark warning after JD Vance and Pete Hegseth had the audacity to chastise European leaders for banning Nazi symbols, accusing them of an assault on free speech.
Thanking European leaders and Ukrainian President Zelensky for speaking out, Heusgen shed a tear: “After Vice President Vance’s speech, we have to fear that our common value base is not that common anymore.” His words underscored a growing rift that runs far deeper than policy disputes.
Make no mistake: this was not about free speech—it never was. It was a firing shot from the U.S. presidential administration, a signal that while America once fought against Nazism in World War II, it has now come full circle to embrace dangerous ideologies that Europe has spent decades healing from and eliminating.
The transatlantic divide lays bare a stark contrast: Germany, though imperfect, has woven accountability into its cultural DNA, while America remains haunted by the ghost of its unburied past. The question is not whether history repeats, but whether we have the capacity to break its cycle, if it’s not too late already.
Part 1: Germany’s Reckoning—A Blueprint for Confronting Darkness
From Rubble to Reflection: Dezanifying an Entire Nation
When the dust settled in 1945 after WWII, Germany faced a harrowing choice: erase the record of its crimes or excavate them. The Nuremberg Trials brought an international spotlight onto its crimes and its perpetrators. Beyond the high profile prosecutions of major Nazi leaders and additional defendants, the broader denazification process required the full-scale cleansing of the entire nation, a “reboot” so to speak.
According to the Allied Museum in Berlin:
It was clear to the victorious Allies of World War II well before the German army capitulated in 1945 that the entirety of German society would need to be cleansed of Nazi influences and effects, and that the Germans would need to be “re-educated” in democratic values. It was relatively simple to repeal Nazi laws, remove symbols of the National Socialist regime from the public realm, cull unwanted books from the libraries, obliterate the swastikas on forms and paperwork, and change street names. A much greater problem was what to do with the some 8.5 million members of the Nazi Party (NSDAP), and the many more millions out of a German population of 70 million who had belonged to one or another Nazi organization – how to denazify them.
Although economic imperatives and Cold War pragmatism allowed many former Nazi officials to remain in power, this initial reckoning established a strong, irrefutable precedent: accountability, however imperfect, was nonnegotiable and needed to be on a nation-wide scale.
The Unfinished Revolution
By the 1960s, a new generation demanded a deeper confrontation with the past. The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trials (1963–1965) put 22 former SS officers on trial, forcing Germans to confront the grim mechanics of genocide. Journalists like Rudolf Augstein of Der Spiegel exposed the continued presence of former Nazis in everyday institutions. This grassroots uprising against denial transformed Germany’s approach from a state-imposed penance into a profound societal revolution for introspection and facing the damning reality of its actions in the cold light of day.
Institutional Transformation
Germany’s transformation was systemic at the root level, not merely surface-level:
Education: Every German state (Land) implements a national framework for Holocaust education. Students routinely visit concentration camp memorials and study both the mechanisms of Nazi terror and the societal conditions that enabled it.
Media: Public broadcasters ARD and ZDF, operating under the Interstate Broadcasting Agreement, are legally mandated to promote democratic values and historical accuracy, ensuring balanced coverage that defends against extremist content.
Corporate Power: The Mitbestimmung system—codified in the 1976 Co-determination Act—requires large companies to maintain supervisory boards with equal representation from employees (including trade union representatives) and shareholders, diffusing concentrated economic power. This pre-empts creating the insurmountable inequality and maltreatment that fueled the financial conditions for Nazism’s rise.
Memory Culture: Over 75,000 Stolpersteine (stumbling stones) have been installed since 1992, marking the last known residences of Holocaust victims and creating a decentralized landscape of remembrance to keep the memories alive.
The Pendulum Swings, but the Foundation Holds
In recent years, the rise of groups like the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), which Elon Musk has enthusiastically and openly supported, has prompted heightened monitoring by the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz domestic intelligence agency (Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution) since 2021. Yet Germany’s layered defenses against historical revisionism continue to hold firm. Accountability remains a muscle honed through decades of collective resolve, and is constantly exercised.
The Public Refuses to Forget
Tens of thousands of anti-right protesters continue to take to the streets in peaceful rallies and marches across the country, reaffirming the mainstream concern for and vigilance against the rise of the AfD in German politics.
Thank you for your readership: To further support my efforts and if you’re able to, consider upgrading to a paid subscription for less than a cup of coffee a month. I’m deeply appreciative of your support!
Part 2: America’s Failure—The Rot of Unspoken Truths
History is not a relic to be archived; in America’s case, history is therapy no one showed up to, its wounds festering until they’ve reached the surface of this nation's identity.
Slavery’s Unwashed Stain and the
In 1861, the United States was torn apart by a brutal Civil War fought over deeply entrenched issues such as slavery, states' rights and the very definition of national unity and American personhood. By 1865, the southern Confederacy, which had seceded to preserve the institution of slavery, were defeated. The promise of Reconstruction—a period when the federal government aimed to rebuild the South and integrate freed Black Americans into society—sparked hope. Initiatives like the “40 Acres and a Mule” promise, which intended to provide newly freed people with land and a means of economic independence, were introduced.
The South’s Unrepentant Original Sin
In 1865, the promise of Reconstruction gave way to a period of backlash and retrenchment. Rather than systematically disassemble the South’s racial caste system, freed Black Americans were abandoned. The “40 Acres and a Mule” promise and reparations were quickly canceled under political and economic pressures.
Unlike Germany, which systematically eradicated symbols of its Nazi past, over 2,000 Confederate symbols still stand in public spaces across America (according to the Southern Poverty Law Center’s 2022 survey). Most of these monuments were erected during the Jim Crow era, not as benign memorials, but as instruments of racial intimidation designed to reinforce a legacy of oppression.
This failure to fully reckon with its civil war past has left America with a living history of denial—a legacy where symbols of a once-seceded regime continue to fuel division and injustice.
The Lost Cause Reborn
Historical revisionism transformed a brutal rebellion into a sanitized myth, turning the perpetrator of brutality into the victim. It didn't just happen—it was manufactured. The United Daughters of the Confederacy, founded in 1894, launched a systematic campaign to rewrite history through textbooks, monuments and cultural programs. Their success was profound:
Films like The Birth of a Nation glorified the Ku Klux Klan and fueled modern white supremacist ideologies.
The "Dunning School" of historiography, dominant in universities until the 1950s, portrayed Reconstruction as a tragic error that oppressed white Southerners
A 2021 American Historical Association study found that:
16 states still use textbooks that minimize slavery's role in causing the Civil War
8 states' standards explicitly frame the conflict through "states' rights"
Only 22 states mandate teaching about the Tulsa Race Massacre
45% of high school students surveyed couldn't identify slavery as the primary cause of the Civil War
This isn't mere academic debate. The Lost Cause mythology provides the intellectual framework for modern white supremacist movements. When neo-Confederates and Proud Boys marched in Charlottesville in 2017, they weren't just defending a statue—they were defending a carefully constructed historical fiction.
Democracy’s Autoimmune Disorder
America’s failure to confront its past has bred a dangerous self-contradiction. The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision (2010) unleashed billions into political campaigns, while Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act shields digital platforms from accountability. Together, these legal frameworks have turned fringe extremism into a mainstream force, eroding the democratic fabric.
Social media ownership concentration has raised new concerns about the private control of public discourse. Major platforms have undergone significant ownership changes, with implications for content moderation policies and information flow. In particular, Elon Musks’s purchase and transformation of Twitter into the Trump’s far-right propaganda platform, while stifling actual free speech criticism, has greatly accelerated the pace and magnitude with which hate and disinformation spread around the world.
The combination is toxic: unlimited dark money funding meets unregulated digital amplification, now concentrated in fewer hands than ever. Historical lies become viral "truth." Confederate ideology gets repackaged as "heritage." White supremacy is marketed as "tradition."
This isn't just institutional failure—it's democratic autoimmune disease. The very systems meant to protect democracy's health are attacking its foundations. Private wealth shapes public discourse while platform consolidation narrows the channels through which Americans understand their own history.
Part 3: Systems Compared—Why One Nation Heals, Another Bleeds
Education:
Germany’s unified, state-mandated curriculum inoculates its youth against extremist narratives through immersive, experiential learning. In contrast, America’s decentralized system allows conservative states like Texas to break constitutional separation of Church and state, mandating Bibles into public schools and rewrite curricula in ways that gloss over the brutal truths of history.
Corporate Power:
German corporate governance—through co-determination and equal representation between shareholders and workers—ensures shared power and curbs the concentration of wealth, while American decisions like Citizens United have privatized democracy and amplified oligarchic influence.
Systemic Cruelty Built Into Cultural Beliefs and Policy:
The divide in values plays out in everyday policy. In related cultural and political contexts, each country also views basic rights as fundamentally opposite. Germany treats access to healthcare, education, and fair wages as basic guarantees, baked into its social contract. The U.S., meanwhile, often treats political liberties – like free speech and gun ownership – as untouchable, even when they clash with other rights. Nowhere is this tension clearer than in conservative states like Texas: State laws make it easier for a school shooter to legally obtain an AR-15 than for a 12-year-old pregnant rape survivor to access reproductive care. The result? A system where gun rights routinely override bodily autonomy, even in cases involving assault survivors and their attackers.
Memory Culture: The Architecture of Remembrance
Germany has built remembrance into its physical landscape. The Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe in Berlin spans 4.7 acres with 2,711 concrete slabs, designed by architect Peter Eisenman and opened in 2005. This central monument anchors a broader network of memory:
75,000 Stolpersteine (brass "stumbling stones") have been installed across Germany as of 2022, each marking the last known residence of a Holocaust victim
Berlin’s Holocaust Memorial stands as a continuous testament to collective mourning
The Topography of Terror documentation center, opened in 2010 on the former Gestapo headquarters site, receives over 1 million visitors annually
Former concentration camps maintain robust educational programs:
Dachau: approximately 900,000 visitors in 2019
Bergen-Belsen: over 300,000 visitors annually pre-pandemic
America's memorial landscape, by comparison, reflects a more fragmented approach to historical memory. These memorials, often underfunded and regionally isolated—fail to weave a unified national memory, especially as many opened too late for the initial impact to become effective when needed:
The National Memorial for Peace and Justice in Montgomery, Alabama, didn’t open until 2018
The National Museum of African American History and Culture opened in 2016, 100 years after initial legislation to do so
According to the SPLC's 2023 database, 723 Confederate monuments STILL remain in public spaces
The Tulsa Race Massacre site only received its first comprehensive memorial in 2021, 100 years after the event
Religious Dynamics: Faith, Power, and Accountability
German churches, having largely confronted their Nazi-era complicity, foster a more secular and introspective public discourse. In the U.S., evangelical and right-wing Catholic factions often employ white Christian nationalism to bury the past and continue to justify racial hierarchies and resist accountability.
German religious institutions' post-war evolution:
The Stuttgart Declaration of Guilt (October 1945) marked the Protestant churches' acknowledgment of complicity
The Catholic Church's "We Remember: A Reflection on the Shoah" (1998) examined Christianity's role in enabling anti-Semitism
Current positions:
The Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD) maintains dedicated programs on historical memory
German Catholic Bishops' Conference regularly issues statements against historical revisionism
American religious institutions show strikingly regressive differences in approaching historical accountability:
Southern Baptist Convention didn’t formally apologize for defending slavery until 1995
Recent polling data (Pew Research Center, 2023):
64% of white evangelicals believe racism is "not a major problem"
71% oppose removing Confederate monuments
The Public Religion Research Institute (2022) found:
57% of white evangelical Protestants embrace at least some Christian nationalist beliefs
29% of white Catholics hold similar views
Now, in 2025, white Christian evangelical nationalism, having played a pivotal role in Trump’s reelection, now openly support policies aligned with fascism and authoritarianism.
Media Systems:
German public broadcasters, bound by legal mandates to promote democratic truth, provide a counterbalance to extremist rhetoric. By contrast, America’s concentrated corporate media landscape, bolstered by broad First Amendment protections, frequently enables divisive and radical voices. We saw this toxic and corrupt dynamic play out in the open during and after the election, when Bezos prevented the Washington Post from endorsing Harris and continuing to stifle anti-Trump editorials.
Germany:
Public broadcasting reaches 93% of population weekly
Required to maintain clear separation between news and commentary
Regular prime-time historical documentaries achieve significant viewership
United States:
Cable news viewership increasingly segregated by political ideology
Social media algorithms amplify extreme content (MIT Technology Review, 2023)
Declining trust in traditional media: 34% trust level (Reuters Institute, 2023)
Part 4: The Path Forward—Suturing the Wound
Radical Truth-Telling:
America must confront its unburied past with a comprehensive national reckoning. Establish a Truth Commission on Slavery and Jim Crow—modeled on South Africa’s—with subpoena power to hold accountable those institutions that profited from historical injustice. Federalize curriculum standards to replace Lost Cause myths with rigorous scholarship, drawing on works like Ta-Nehisi Coates’ The Case for Reparations and initiatives such as the 1619 Project.
The Firewall:
Reform campaign finance by repealing or replacing Citizens United with publicly funded elections. Amend Section 230 to hold platforms accountable for algorithmically amplifying hate speech. Deploy law enforcement, including the FBI, with renewed determination against domestic terrorism.
Building Consensus and Oversight:
Establish permanent, nonpartisan watchdogs to monitor democratic backsliding and extremist infiltration. Invest in civic education and media literacy to cultivate a culture of critical inquiry. Empower artists, filmmakers, and writers to challenge sanitized narratives and spark a cultural reawakening. Forge global alliances to share best practices and explore reparative justice measures for historical wrongs.
The Final Reckoning
Christoph Heusgen’s impassioned farewell at the Munich Security Conference serves as a wake-up call: our shared democratic values are fraying. Germany’s relentless journey of self-examination, and willingness to face discomfort in speaking truth to power, shows us that confronting the darkest chapters of history can forge a resilient society built on truth.
In stark contrast, America’s refusal to fully reckon with its past, and inability to face discomfort with its ugly history, has allowed revisionist myths and white supremacist ideologies to thrive. As extremist impulses spread across the country and around the world, the stakes are clear: break the cycle of denial or allow unburied ghosts to dictate our future.
With Project 2025 white Christian National agenda being fully embraced and enacted into policy and executive orders, the stakes have never been higher.
The wound remains open—and the road to healing is steep, littered with decades of entrenched denial, revisionist propaganda and oligarchic influence. Overcoming this legacy will demand nothing less than a sustained, nationwide struggle; democracy is not a relic, but a daily, grueling battle for truth and justice. The world is watching, and the challenge before us is formidable.
Sources and Suggested Further Reading:
Evans, Richard J. The Coming of the Third Reich. Penguin Books, 2003.
– Detailed account of the rise of Nazism and postwar denazification challenges.Judt, Tony. Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945. Penguin Books, 2006.
– Comprehensive insights into Europe’s reconstruction and Germany’s institutional transformation.Foner, Eric. Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877. Harper & Row, 1988.
– Analysis of post-Civil War failures and the emergence of the Lost Cause myth.Anderson, Carol. White Rage: The Unspoken Truth of Our Racial Divide. Bloomsbury Press, 2016.
– Explores the historical roots and modern consequences of white supremacist ideologies in America.Hofstadter, Richard. Anti-Intellectualism in American Life. Vintage, 2012.
– Analysis of the cultural distrust of expertise that underpins revisionist narratives.Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010).
– Landmark decision that reshaped campaign finance and amplified billionaire political influence.Balmer, Randall. The Making of Evangelicalism: From Revivalism to Politics and Beyond. Baylor University Press, 2004.
– Examines the evolution of evangelical Christianity and its impact on political ideology.Assmann, Aleida, and Jan Assmann. Cultural Memory and Western Civilization: Functions, Media, Archives. Cambridge University Press, 2011.
– Discusses how cultural memory is maintained and processed in modern societies.Blight, David W. Race and Reunion: The Civil War in American Memory. Harvard University Press, 2001.
– Examination of the Lost Cause narrative and its enduring impact on American memory.Scholarly Articles on Mitbestimmung and Corporate Governance in Germany.
– Peer-reviewed sources (e.g., articles in the Journal of Comparative Corporate Governance) detailing Germany’s co-determination model.